Questionable £1 coins determined to be production error as Royal Mint ‘confident’ piece is legitimate

The alleged forgery of a £1 circulation coin recently issued by the Royal Mint has been determined to be a production error rather than a counterfeit.

According to a story published by The Telegraph on April 25, a spokesman for the Royal Mint said they are “confident” the coin is legitimate after analyzing images of the coin.

The production error could carry some numismatic interest—and value—if the mint’s claims are true.

“We are not aware of any counterfeits entering circulation,” a Royal Mint spokesman told The Telegraph. “Variances will always occur in a small number of coins, particularly in the striking process, due to the high volumes and speed of production.”

A total of 1.5 billion new £1 coins, the first of which entered circulation last month, are slated to be issued.

Baldwin’s Dominic Chorney told The Telegraph several of the coin’s elements are “mis-aligned.”

“The coin appears to be a mis-strike, meaning it is a genuine coin which has become mis-aligned during the striking process,” he said, adding the mis-strike appears to have removed the coin’s security hologram.

It is unknown how many misprinted £1 coins have been struck by the Royal Mint at this time.

Leave a Reply

Keep up to date with the numismatic community

Sign up to receive our newsletter.

Canadian Coin News

Canada

Canadian Coin News is Canada's premier source of information about coins, notes and medals.

Although we cover the entire world of numismatics, the majority of our readers are Canadian, and we concentrate on the unique circumstances surrounding collecting in our native land.

Send Us Your Event

Running an event? Send it to us and we will display it on Canadian Coin News!

Submit Event →

Subscribe To 26 Issues For Just $47.99/year

Subscribe today to receive Canada's premier coin publication. Canadian Coin News is available in both paper and digital forms.

Subscribe Now

We acknowledge the financial support of the Government of Canada through the Canada Periodical Fund of the Department of Canadian Heritage.